L’ANALISI CRITICA DELLA LETTERATURA SCIENTIFICA

1. 1.Bucher HC et al.. Users' guides to the medical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. JAMA. 1999;282(8):771-8. 1999
   Articolo scientificoJAMA. 1999;282(8):771-8Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
2. 2.Sterne JAC et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898.. 2019
   Articolo scientificoBMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898.Cerca su Google Scholar
3. 3.Philip Sedgwick. Meta-analyses: how to read a funnel plot. BMJ 2013; 346 :f1342. 2013
   Articolo scientificoBMJ 2013; 346 :f1342Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
4. 4.Hannah R. Rothstein (Editor), Alexander J. Sutton (Editor), Michael Borenstein (Editor). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2005
   Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
   LibroCerca su Amazon
5. 5.Jones CW. Primary outcome switching among drug trials with and without principal investigator financial ties to industry: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e019831. 2018
   Articolo scientificoBMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e019831Leggi il PDF gratuito
6. 6.Olivo SA et al.. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(2):156-75. 2008
   Articolo scientificoPhys Ther. 2008;88(2):156-75Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita

I link ai libri possono contenere un codice affiliato Amazon: in qualità di affiliato, ECM Finder potrebbe ricevere una commissione sugli acquisti idonei, senza alcun costo aggiuntivo per te. I link ai paper rimandano alla fonte scientifica (DOI, versione open-access o ricerca accademica).