REVISIONI SISTEMATICHE E META-ANALISI: METODOLOGIE DI PRODUZIONE E REPORTING

1. 1.Hu K et al.. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO. Res Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):394-405.. 2021
   Articolo scientificoRes Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):394-405.Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
2. 2.Tawfik GM et al.. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):213.. 2020
   Articolo scientificoBMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):213.Leggi il PDF gratuito
3. 3.Rethlefsen ML et al.. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.. 2021
   Articolo scientificoSyst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.Leggi il PDF gratuito
4. 4.Caulley L et al.. Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:87-94.. 2020
   Articolo scientificoJ Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:87-94.Leggi il PDF gratuito
5. 5.Page MJ et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71.. 2021
   Articolo scientificoBMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71.Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
6. 6.Sterne JAC et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898.. 2019
   Articolo scientificoBMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898.Cerca su Google Scholar
7. 7.Cooper C et al.. What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web-searching for systematic reviews: A case study.. Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jul;12(4):557-570. 2021
   Articolo scientificoRes Synth Methods. 2021 Jul;12(4):557-570Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
8. 8.Brozek J et al.. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302.. 2011
   Articolo scientificoJ Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302.Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
9. 9.Hannah R. Rothstein (Editor), Alexander J. Sutton (Editor), Michael Borenstein (Editor). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2005
   Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
   LibroCerca su Amazon
10. 10.Philip Sedgwick. Meta-analyses: how to read a funnel plot. BMJ 2013; 346 :f1342. 2013
    Articolo scientificoBMJ 2013; 346 :f1342Leggi il paperCerca versione gratuita
11. 11.Jayne F. Tierney et al.. How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov; 68(11): 1325–1335. 2015
    Articolo scientificoJ Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov; 68(11): 1325–1335Leggi il PDF gratuito
12. 12.Cipriani A et al.. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. 2018
    Articolo scientificoLancet 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366Leggi il PDF gratuito

I link ai libri possono contenere un codice affiliato Amazon: in qualità di affiliato, ECM Finder potrebbe ricevere una commissione sugli acquisti idonei, senza alcun costo aggiuntivo per te. I link ai paper rimandano alla fonte scientifica (DOI, versione open-access o ricerca accademica).